There’s nothing stretches Alf’s liberalism and tolerance as much as intolerance.
But intolerance, sadly, is on the march.
A recent example is the outburst of indignation triggered by a Northland church’s organisation of a seminar offering to help people overcome their “same-sex attraction issues”.
This has sparked a furore on social media and in the gay community, according to the NZ Herald.
The talk, at Paihia’s Baptist Church, was advertised in Mid North community newspapers this week. The ad invited anyone who had problems with same-sex attraction, or a loved one who did, to hear the life story of a man who had overcome his issues.
He and his wife had helped many others, the ad said.
Is there hint here that it is compulsory for gays to attend this seminar?
Nope. Attendance would be strictly voluntary.
But gays and illiberals are kicking up a fuss.
The backlash started with a post on the Northland Grapevine Facebook page, which had more than 230 comments by noon yesterday.
Comments ranged from those who were appalled by the implication that being gay was a condition that had to be overcome, to those who defended the church’s right to host the talk or were concerned by what they saw as a threat to free speech.
Others saw the reaction against the talk as a sign of how far society had progressed in its acceptance of different expressions of sexuality.
But what progress is society making when a perfectly legal seminar becomes the target for ostracism?
The church’s Facebook page has been swamped with comments criticising the talk.
In the face of such opprobrium it is not surprising that organisers are preferring to lie low.
Pastor Bill Anderson did not wish to comment, saying only that it was a “calm, quiet little ad extending an offer of help to people who are hurting inside”.
He was disappointed with the attacks on him and the church, and that many people only seemed to show an interest in the church when there was controversy.
According to the Herald, an Ohaeawai woman’s Facebook post sparked the furore. She is named as Alissa Gibbs and she said she was “really riled” by the ad at first.
Why she or anybody should be riled by something she or they did not have to attend is a mystery.
But she does a splendid job of admitting to be intolerant of intolerance.
“I don’t think that sort of intolerance has a place in our little community. I wanted to draw it to people’s attention, I didn’t expect such a backlash and I didn’t intend people to jump down the church’s throat.”
However, she stood by her views that the ad was unacceptable. If someone was genuinely unhappy or confused by their sexuality, they should seek help from a trained professional, “not from someone who’s prayed their gay away”.
Ms Gibbs said she was considering a peaceful protest.
Obviously, this will underscore her intolerance of intolerance.
We may suppose she does not recognise the profound paradox.