When building has been vetoed, the building plans might just as well be used for dunny paper

It took a while for Alf to find out why a multi-millionaire’s family has been denied approval to build two houses on their own property on Waiheke Island.

There’s a whiff of objections being raised just because the buggers are rich.

Objectors to the housing plans wailed about the mischief that would be done to some old bones on the property.

But the bones weren’t the undoing of the Spencers.

The Herald tells the story today:

Auckland’s secretive multimillionaire Spencer family have been banned from building two sleek new architect-designed houses on their $75 million Waiheke Island estate.

The Herald is no hurry to give the reasons. It goes on to say:

The publicity-shy Spencers, who are estimated to be worth $650 million, control an entire end of the island via their 1800ha cattle, sheep, wine and olive operations.

For three decades, they have dominated the unpopulated northeastern portion from Owhiti Bay to Man O’War Bay via their Man O’War Station with six houses, farm buildings, a rapidly expanding winery and 90,000 native trees which they planted.

Expert Environment Court witnesses said the station’s owners wanted to live in a new main dwelling “as the principal family base for the owners of the property when resident on the island”.

John Spencer’s son and heir, Berridge, directs the station company although ownership traces back to Clime Asset Management, the Spencers’ main business.

The houses were proposed for 725 Man O’War Bay Rd, listed on QV as an 802ha site worth $34.4 million: $31.95 million land and $2.49 million buildings.

Yep. But why can’t the Spencers build on their bit of land?

House-building and earthworks are non-complying activities for the dune site, the only change allowed being eco-sourced planting.

Six archaeologists, including one for Ngati Paoa Tribal Trust, were court-ordered into a caucus to agree on the land’s heritage values.

Evidence was presented of the area holding valuable objects such as moa and tuatara bones, fish hooks, obsidian flakes and chert drills.

Alf had never heard of obsidian flakes or chert drills, and hence could not get too excited about whether they were buried under two new houses or not.

He asked Mrs Grumble to do a bit of research, and she reported back that obsidian is a hard, dark, glasslike volcanic rock formed by the rapid solidification of lava without crystallization.

Wow. Does that make it more desirable from a heritage point of view than – say – a bit of sand?

Oh, and chert drills are implements made from a type of stone.

But as it turns out, the bones, stones and other bits of historical detritus didn’t bugger up the Spencers’ plans.

Rather, they fell afoul of two local authorities with two different sets of attitudes.

Auckland City had granted the station permission to build but the Auckland Regional Council opposed that in the Environment Court in hearings in April and May. The ARC said it was wrong to put such large houses on one of Waiheke’s few remaining undeveloped coasts when only 160 visitors a year would attend the wine marketing courses.

Allowing the houses would result in further developments.

Judge Laurie Newhook and two commissioners sided with the regional council and said more places would be developed in the unspoiled area if they allowed the Spencer proposal.

The effects of the house-building proposal on the heritage aspects of the property were “relatively neutral” and could be addressed by imposing conditions, the court decided. But it put more weight on the effects on the natural character of the coastland environment and its outstanding natural landscape.

The effects would be more than minor and there were adverse impacts on the environment from granting consent, the court ruled.

The Spencer family fortune, the way Alf remembers it, was built on the making of dunny paper.

Here’s hoping the architects drew up their plans on soft paper, because it seems they might just as well be put to the same use as the dunny paper.

One Response to When building has been vetoed, the building plans might just as well be used for dunny paper

  1. pmofnz says:

    “There’s a whiff of objections being raised just because the buggers are rich”

    Damned right. This is another piece of a saga that has been going to and fro for nigh on two decades or maybe three.

    All those years ago when the Chris Carter’s of the world and their boy-chum mates decided Waiheke was the place to be for their weekend jaunts hidden away from reality the place went to the crapper. Along with every rabid greenie unwashed type that seemed to heave up on the shores screaming save this and that and hug more trees.

    The tone of the place went fast from a place frequented by yachties away for a getaway weekend on the turps to an overpriced, overblown yuppie nutters paradise, with horrendous rises in property prices.

    Now Mr Spencer had a run-in then with the then local council. Would have been pre-amalgamation before 1989? Seemed the eco-zealots decided his piece of land at Stony Batter complete with gun emplacements was theirs to access wherever and whenever via a metalled road track.

    He however, rightly took a very different view and promptly dumped a few loads of metal across their main access route, which I believe was only a paper road. Both parties, if I remember rightly, agreed to disagree. Didn’t worry the pissheads arriving by sea – we still occasionally walked up to Stony Batter.

    I suspect the result of that action still is evident in the recent environment court ruling. Those bearded feral tree huggers never give up trying to have a piece of others property.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: